Well, it seems that every young whippersnapper surf these days is coming out and exposing the scammers/cheaters in their system.
Some people, as we say in Australia, have ‘cracked a sook’ about some surfs sharing too many details about members this way, and there is validity to that argument.
Either way, here’s the latest tidbit from GlobalAdsPro on that front… Interestingly some of the cheater accounts shown are merely there to flog another surf. A conspiracy? I’d like to think so.
Because conspiracies make it fun!
Also, despite the slowdown with the ’scrupulous checking’ of accounts, it appears (according to the forums) they are continuing to chug along with the payments. Many people may see this as a bad sign, a few-days-gap, but it can in fact be a positive thing, especially if the excuse is found to be valid. That three days, kept consistent, could end up prolonging the life of the program by who knows how long (but then again, it could not - but sometimes it’s not so simple as to say “this is good!” or “this is bad!”.) (The seven day 12DP wait had a lot to do with its endurance, and in recent times we’ve seen programs with nigh on instant payments - the problem being of course, that they bite the dust that much quicker.)
Anyway, here’s the mini little cheater expose posted by Trish…
“Temporary solution to Singaporean and similar accounts (same IP) - no referral commissions will apply. In other words, such accounts will have their upline as well as downline removed as the next priority task after all payouts are caught up.
Payouts will now take way longer as I will scrupulously audit each and every account, no exceptions. The result: below I will place IPs, email used, link(s) submitted for rotation of scammers who believe I’m an idiot not to notice no funds have ever been deposited into our account from theirs - do they really reckon I’ve got a mint at the office?
1. Mr cali land (lol) | Khs_sinvest @ yahoo.com | 154.35.1.12 | http://choicesurf.com (how interesting) | claims to be using e-gold acc. 3076371
2. Mr Mania Brarar (where do they come up with these, rofl) | maniabrarar @ yahoo.com | 154.35.1.12 | claims to be using e-gold acc. 2925093
3. Lona kabon | Lonakabon @ yahoo.com | 195.111.2.64 | http://choicesurf.com | claims to be using e-gold acc. 3076371 and 3076423
4. Malak Haddad | mouroforo @ yahoo.fr | 196.203.39.6 | http://autosurf.net | claims to be using e-gold acc. 3075969
If you are a program owner, feel free to email me for some eye-opening information - but I reserve the right to decision who I share the information with.”
Popularity: 1% [?]

First, I believe Trish (who is an experienced admin) will overcome the problem soon.
I won’t talk about the cheaters or scammers but the payouts delay.
The mistake made by a lot of admins is that they put payouts in 24hrs in their TOS BUT when some unforeseen events occur (DDOS, scripts prbs, account hacked, sudden growth of the members,..), there are delay in the payouts, people start panicking.. and their reaction could put a good program down.
The other mistake is that some admins put payouts within 7 days in their TOS while they are paying fast (within 24hrs) but when they are paying within - let’s say - 4-5 days, they still respect their terms BUT people start panicking too and this could also kill a good program quicker.
Finally the duration of a good program depends (often) on the member’s reaction.
So the best thing to do is to put payouts within 7 days in their TOS and admins should take their time to pay on the 7th day (this even if they can pay earlier).
It may be one of the reasons why 12dp lasted so long.
Seems a lot of cheaters are chucking a wobbly you can feel it but not such a bad idea sharing between a few more “honest” admin and support staff
really. On another note if a few “kings” or queens fall of the wall like humpty so be it.
I’ve gotten paid for my first cycle of GAP. Most probably after the 2nd smaller amount expires, I won’t be continuing with them.
It’s good when the money is in the pocket.
I didn’t even know there’s a 5% withdrawal charge.