<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: I Love Cheerleaders!</title>
	<atom:link href="http://hyipblog.nobshyip.net/2006/10/28/i-love-cheerleaders/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://hyipblog.nobshyip.net/2006/10/28/i-love-cheerleaders/</link>
	<description>the latest HYIP community updates, from readers, to readers</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 14:46:28 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: mbongwe</title>
		<link>http://hyipblog.nobshyip.net/2006/10/28/i-love-cheerleaders/#comment-17346</link>
		<dc:creator>mbongwe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Oct 2006 19:42:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hyipblog.nobshyip.net/2006/10/28/i-love-cheerleaders/#comment-17346</guid>
		<description>Excellent post, Devilboy. And I agree, HYIPDiscussion.com is the best example of how the group psychology and cheerleading works (a good reason for me to visit that forum very rarely recently)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Excellent post, Devilboy. And I agree, HYIPDiscussion.com is the best example of how the group psychology and cheerleading works (a good reason for me to visit that forum very rarely recently)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jude</title>
		<link>http://hyipblog.nobshyip.net/2006/10/28/i-love-cheerleaders/#comment-17308</link>
		<dc:creator>Jude</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Oct 2006 13:00:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hyipblog.nobshyip.net/2006/10/28/i-love-cheerleaders/#comment-17308</guid>
		<description>I think this blog entry is not attributed to just warn you on Rog&#039;s program. By the way, great blog entry Devilboy! Seems like research was done before presenting this entry ;)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think this blog entry is not attributed to just warn you on Rog&#8217;s program. By the way, great blog entry Devilboy! Seems like research was done before presenting this entry <img src='http://hyipblog.nobshyip.net/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jabez</title>
		<link>http://hyipblog.nobshyip.net/2006/10/28/i-love-cheerleaders/#comment-17300</link>
		<dc:creator>jabez</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Oct 2006 10:02:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hyipblog.nobshyip.net/2006/10/28/i-love-cheerleaders/#comment-17300</guid>
		<description>the more uniform &amp; louder the cheer leading is often a good sign of the herd instinct taking predominance.  further, if there are sharp or violent reactions to the smallest of negativism or critique clearly indicates the desire to dominate the audience of investors.  all these are important signs of weakness rather than strength of a program.

a really good &amp; genuine program that pays consistently beyond 5 years would silent any critic regardless of whether it has adequate DD or has gone private.

most will die out within 5 years, even if there is DD or has gone private.  &amp; time is still the best testament of an investment program&#039;s real strength &amp; viability.

the debate of words, arguments, banning of members, etc has little effect in changing the truth eventually.  program owners &amp; their admins will try their best to manipulate their potential audience of investors, but each individual has to decide when to hold &amp; when to run ...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>the more uniform &amp; louder the cheer leading is often a good sign of the herd instinct taking predominance.  further, if there are sharp or violent reactions to the smallest of negativism or critique clearly indicates the desire to dominate the audience of investors.  all these are important signs of weakness rather than strength of a program.</p>
<p>a really good &amp; genuine program that pays consistently beyond 5 years would silent any critic regardless of whether it has adequate DD or has gone private.</p>
<p>most will die out within 5 years, even if there is DD or has gone private.  &amp; time is still the best testament of an investment program&#8217;s real strength &amp; viability.</p>
<p>the debate of words, arguments, banning of members, etc has little effect in changing the truth eventually.  program owners &amp; their admins will try their best to manipulate their potential audience of investors, but each individual has to decide when to hold &amp; when to run &#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mrydzh</title>
		<link>http://hyipblog.nobshyip.net/2006/10/28/i-love-cheerleaders/#comment-17299</link>
		<dc:creator>mrydzh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Oct 2006 09:09:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hyipblog.nobshyip.net/2006/10/28/i-love-cheerleaders/#comment-17299</guid>
		<description>So you are telling us to keep away from Rogâ€™s Magic Profit Program.Am I right?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So you are telling us to keep away from Rogâ€™s Magic Profit Program.Am I right?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

