<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.2.1" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Finer Things - Backend Shift</title>
	<link>http://hyipblog.nobshyip.net/2006/12/03/the-finer-things-backend-shift/</link>
	<description>the latest HYIP community updates, from readers, to readers</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 21 Nov 2008 11:56:53 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.2.1</generator>

	<item>
		<title>By: ScottT</title>
		<link>http://hyipblog.nobshyip.net/2006/12/03/the-finer-things-backend-shift/#comment-22711</link>
		<author>ScottT</author>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Dec 2006 23:53:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://hyipblog.nobshyip.net/2006/12/03/the-finer-things-backend-shift/#comment-22711</guid>
		<description>Already record all my own info as it pertains to all particulars for any spend so that's not an issue for me.  I agree whole-heartedly with your feedback as to referrals. I am concerned with the longer-term integrity of the program, not a fancy site, referrals, blah, blah, blah (see KaOnline)....

Thanks for the input.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Already record all my own info as it pertains to all particulars for any spend so that&#8217;s not an issue for me.  I agree whole-heartedly with your feedback as to referrals. I am concerned with the longer-term integrity of the program, not a fancy site, referrals, blah, blah, blah (see KaOnline)&#8230;.</p>
<p>Thanks for the input.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jude</title>
		<link>http://hyipblog.nobshyip.net/2006/12/03/the-finer-things-backend-shift/#comment-22582</link>
		<author>Jude</author>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Dec 2006 05:18:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://hyipblog.nobshyip.net/2006/12/03/the-finer-things-backend-shift/#comment-22582</guid>
		<description>I wouldn't give them a flag for that. It's okay that if they're paying referral fees or not as that wouldn't really be important. To fix a maximum of $2,000 per deposit per day means referee gets $60 and nothing more for one time. So it's a pretty smart move.

I'd prefer security and smooth server than those referral whores keep logging   in just to check on their referral stats.

Then again you'll have to record your own spendings to your own sheet to avoid forgetting your deposit dates.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I wouldn&#8217;t give them a flag for that. It&#8217;s okay that if they&#8217;re paying referral fees or not as that wouldn&#8217;t really be important. To fix a maximum of $2,000 per deposit per day means referee gets $60 and nothing more for one time. So it&#8217;s a pretty smart move.</p>
<p>I&#8217;d prefer security and smooth server than those referral whores keep logging   in just to check on their referral stats.</p>
<p>Then again you&#8217;ll have to record your own spendings to your own sheet to avoid forgetting your deposit dates.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ScottT</title>
		<link>http://hyipblog.nobshyip.net/2006/12/03/the-finer-things-backend-shift/#comment-22551</link>
		<author>ScottT</author>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Dec 2006 01:34:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://hyipblog.nobshyip.net/2006/12/03/the-finer-things-backend-shift/#comment-22551</guid>
		<description>Any reason to be concerned or is this ultimately a good thing?  It seems that the only true concern would be to those "marketing" the program as the website contains minimal info and now no referrals will be paid. Neither of these concern me - so any other "red flags" need to go up due to the changes?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Any reason to be concerned or is this ultimately a good thing?  It seems that the only true concern would be to those &#8220;marketing&#8221; the program as the website contains minimal info and now no referrals will be paid. Neither of these concern me - so any other &#8220;red flags&#8221; need to go up due to the changes?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
