<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.2.1" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: FX-Experts - The Official Reply</title>
	<link>http://hyipblog.nobshyip.net/2006/12/20/fx-experts-the-official-reply/</link>
	<description>the latest HYIP community updates, from readers, to readers</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 04 Dec 2008 03:10:24 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.2.1</generator>

	<item>
		<title>By: Rob</title>
		<link>http://hyipblog.nobshyip.net/2006/12/20/fx-experts-the-official-reply/#comment-29334</link>
		<author>Rob</author>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Dec 2006 05:04:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://hyipblog.nobshyip.net/2006/12/20/fx-experts-the-official-reply/#comment-29334</guid>
		<description>Good observation Chris. You are missing something though:

80% of the funds were lost in an account that held 70% of the total funds, not 80% of the whole funds. This means that at least the remaining 30% was supposedly safe.

Now the 20% saved from the debacle represents a 14% of the total funds, which means FXE was actually down to (30+14 = ) 44% of the break even point when they were put on hold on 1st Sept.

Then we are told that they gained back a 7%. It's not clear whether it is a 7% of the total funds or a 7% of the remaining funds. Either way, the best guess is that we are about half way of a full recovery.

As you correctly point out, this means a 200% gain or more needs to be made on the remaining funds to be back to the break even point. Still a long road...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good observation Chris. You are missing something though:</p>
<p>80% of the funds were lost in an account that held 70% of the total funds, not 80% of the whole funds. This means that at least the remaining 30% was supposedly safe.</p>
<p>Now the 20% saved from the debacle represents a 14% of the total funds, which means FXE was actually down to (30+14 = ) 44% of the break even point when they were put on hold on 1st Sept.</p>
<p>Then we are told that they gained back a 7%. It&#8217;s not clear whether it is a 7% of the total funds or a 7% of the remaining funds. Either way, the best guess is that we are about half way of a full recovery.</p>
<p>As you correctly point out, this means a 200% gain or more needs to be made on the remaining funds to be back to the break even point. Still a long road&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris</title>
		<link>http://hyipblog.nobshyip.net/2006/12/20/fx-experts-the-official-reply/#comment-29004</link>
		<author>Chris</author>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Dec 2006 04:56:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://hyipblog.nobshyip.net/2006/12/20/fx-experts-the-official-reply/#comment-29004</guid>
		<description>Small mathematical observations...

They lost 80% of the main account... So that would mean they have 20% left.

Then they already regained 7% of the total INITIAL deposit.  So they made a total of around 30% of what the remaining funds were.

Losing 80% is one thing, but gaining it back is another.  You would have to actually gain 500% of what was left. I repeat, you're not going to need to gain 80% in the few months that you're asking, you're going to need to double up the account, then double up again, then get another 25% of that account in order to be back to 100% of initial.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Small mathematical observations&#8230;</p>
<p>They lost 80% of the main account&#8230; So that would mean they have 20% left.</p>
<p>Then they already regained 7% of the total INITIAL deposit.  So they made a total of around 30% of what the remaining funds were.</p>
<p>Losing 80% is one thing, but gaining it back is another.  You would have to actually gain 500% of what was left. I repeat, you&#8217;re not going to need to gain 80% in the few months that you&#8217;re asking, you&#8217;re going to need to double up the account, then double up again, then get another 25% of that account in order to be back to 100% of initial.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alonzo</title>
		<link>http://hyipblog.nobshyip.net/2006/12/20/fx-experts-the-official-reply/#comment-27560</link>
		<author>Alonzo</author>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Dec 2006 18:34:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://hyipblog.nobshyip.net/2006/12/20/fx-experts-the-official-reply/#comment-27560</guid>
		<description>It's sad that this happend, i'm confident enough that marcos will recover a part or more of our deposits. Honesty pay's!!!!!!!! sometimes it takes a bit longer then most of us want it to take. Just bad luck for us. But i'd like to say to Marcos there comes a day it will pay off in favour of you. Good luck!!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s sad that this happend, i&#8217;m confident enough that marcos will recover a part or more of our deposits. Honesty pay&#8217;s!!!!!!!! sometimes it takes a bit longer then most of us want it to take. Just bad luck for us. But i&#8217;d like to say to Marcos there comes a day it will pay off in favour of you. Good luck!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
