Comments on: Life Holdings Switches Monthly Payout

By: Rico

Rico — Tue, 17 Jul 2007 02:50:09 +0000

15% per month? Dan would have few peers, if any, at that level. The long-term outlook seems especially promising.

Rico

By: bwatson

bwatson — Mon, 16 Jul 2007 18:30:06 +0000

Dan,

It all sounds good to me. I finally got my e-bullion account funded, and will making my first investment shortly. I am looking forward to the 15% per month, but will accept whatever you can provide as long as you stick around.

Bruce

By: Rico

Rico — Sat, 30 Jun 2007 02:35:09 +0000

Dan,

I’m with you 100 percent. You’re doing a terrific job.

Rico

By: Dan

Dan — Sat, 30 Jun 2007 00:44:36 +0000

Hello,

Maybe it’s the way I wrote it, but there’s nothing wrong with it.

80-90% of all Life Holdings members have less then $1,000 invested. I want to fully refund (aka kick out) these members and some of the larger members as well while I am sorting out my own problems.

I plan to continue with Life Holdings in a new formula from now on. Less members, monthly payments, more actual work, higher returns (back in the 15% monthly zone), less administrative work.

The refunding process will take at least 2 months, that’s for sure. For those without patience, they will be put on the refund list, even if it takes more then usual for them to receive their funds. For those with patience, the future looks bright.

Regards,
Dan

By: misa

misa — Sat, 30 Jun 2007 00:25:57 +0000

Dan, may I know what do you mean when you said in your post in LH forum “i have a nice little plan, that will kick out almost all members in 2-4 months”.

Can you elaborate this more? I sense something not good with that phrase.

regards

By: Investex Group

Investex Group — Wed, 27 Jun 2007 00:12:51 +0000

Yes,
monthly payouts allows the admins of real Investment plans to concentrate on their program solidly, like trading, maintaining, updating, support, and also payout to members as well as many other things.

By: wiztek

wiztek — Mon, 25 Jun 2007 13:18:50 +0000

As a general rule any change in ROI, or payouts would be a redflag. However, on the contrary, here, however given what we know one man doing eveything, its makes much sence to reduce the admin needed to run this expanding program, and besides its not a big surprise given the problems with e currencies in general. My personal take is another point to Dan for good money management.

By: Dan

Dan — Mon, 25 Jun 2007 10:44:34 +0000

Weekly payouts are solemly there, to *spoil* the members.

Makila that is the best observation anyone made so far *thumbs up

Regards,
Dan

By: makila

makila — Mon, 25 Jun 2007 04:43:24 +0000

Its also dangerous to wire in and out anything over 10000$. The plans Dan has to go offshore may be a solution to this. Luxumburg, swiss or even further works.

By: makila

makila — Mon, 25 Jun 2007 04:38:04 +0000

Weekly payouts are solemly there, to *spoil* the members. For a real site with a real admin in command, its impossible to keep up paying out every single week. Perhaps his bank stopped him, but even if his bank didnt placed a limit, I still feel Dan was already planning to switch to monthly payouts. I am not worried about it.